When I went to a charismatic, Bible-believing church, we were taught, and I believed, that the Bible was the inerrant Word of God. God the Holy Spirit had inspired men to write down exactly what God wanted them to say and so, as it says in 2 Timothy 3:16 “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.” I have only recently come to understand that the “Scripture” referred to here is, as in the other fifty cases where the New Testament writers use this word, referring to the Old Testament. We were taught to understand, probably on the rather weak basis of 2 Peter 3:16, that the New Testament was also Scripture and therefore God-breathed and inerrant. Hence, everything written in the books of the New Testament in our Bibles was authoritative.

When you are ignorantly living in a sect, you accept such propositions as the truth since you love and respect you leaders, dread the rejection of your friends and fear God’s wrath lest you become ignorant and unstable and distort the truth to your own destruction (2 Peter 3:16). However, once you have escaped the sect and research topics that were never even touched on by its leaders, teachers and preachers, you soon see the incredible inconsistencies.

First of all, the decisions that were made during the 300 years (!) after Jesus’ death as to which books and letters should be included in the canon of the New Testament are such a chaotic patchwork of human arguments and uncertainty that it is impossible to maintain that God Himself infallibly determined the contents of the canon. If, as a compromise, you were to believe that God guided the early church inerrantly through this chaos, then the church takes on a higher status than Scripture itself, leading us to the Roman Catholic papal position, which has been considered heresy by Protestants since the day that Martin Luther placed the apocryphal writings in a separate part of the Bible.

Secondly, as Erasmus (1466-1536) knew from his exploration of scriptural texts, the Christian church had for over a thousand years a version of the New Testament which contained very considerable errors and omissions. How are we to square the circle of the Bible being the inerrant Word of God that is to be followed faithfully by all Christians, yet these Christians have the wrong Bible?

Thirdly, in the sect to which I belonged for twenty years of my life, there prevailed an arrogant certainty that “our” interpretation of the Bible must be correct. The historical and cultural context that would unquestionably assist the interpretation of any text is not required by us since the Holy Spirit, who wrote the text, will endow our preachers with an equally God-inspired, flawless interpretation. If the Bible recounts events at Pentecost in which believers are baptised in the Holy Spirit (e.g. in Acts Chapter 10), speak in tongues, interpret tongues, effect miracles and prophesy, then this is unquestionably to be the norm for every Christian church until the day that Jesus comes again. Those who preach otherwise are either misguided or heretics, such as the entire Baptist Church. I actually believed this. Seriously. Yet never did I question why women did not have their heads covered in our sect ( 1 Corinthians 11:6) or why they were allowed to speak and even prophesy when the Bible says that “women should remain silent” and that it is “disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church” (1 Corinthians 14: 34-35).

These same inconsistencies are applied to the interpretation and application of passages from the genuinely God-breathed Old Testament too, further undermining the position of errant arrogance that in the end always comes down to an abuse of authority in such conservative circles. For example, why do fathers no longer present their disobedient sons to be publicly stoned to death? Why are women on their period not regarded as unclean and banned from church gatherings? Why are practising homosexuals not annihilated in the same way as the men of Sodom and Gomorrah – even though the biblical story of Sodom and Gomorrah has absolutely nothing to do with homosexual relationships and identity?

The Bible is an awesome piece of inspired literature and may even be a revelation of God – at least for those who choose to believe that. But those who use its unproven inerrancy in order to wield their interpretative arrogance and self-appointed authority should be ashamed of themselves for the division, pain and deaths they have caused for three hundred years since the birth of Jesus Christ.

“When the missionaries came to Africa, they had the Bible and we had the land. They said ‘Let us pray.’ We closed our eyes. When we opened them we had the Bible and they had the land.” – Desmond Tutu